Definition: Then came the same Sheshbazzar, [and] laid the foundation of the house of God which [is] in Jerusalem: and since that time even until now hath it been in building, and [yet] it is not finished.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezra 5:16. It's a bit complex, but we can understand it as follows: What it means in plain language: “Then came the same Sheshbazzar, and laid the foundation of the house of God which is in Jerusalem: and since that time even until now hath it been in building, and yet it is not finished.” Let’s unpack it piece by piece: "Then came the same Sheshbazzar..." : This refers to a person named Sheshbazzar. He was a prominent leader during the Second Temple period (around 46 BC). “Sheshbazzar” is a Hebrew name that means “the builder.” "...and laid the foundation of the house of God which [is] in Jerusalem..." : This is the key part. Sheshbazzar was commissioned to build a temple for God in Jerusalem. He started building it, and he established it in the city. "And since that time even until now hath it been in building, and yet it is not finished." : This means that this building project has always been ongoing – ever since Sheshbazzar began. However, it's not complete. It’s still under construction. What does it tell us about the story? This verse speaks to a period of significant rebuilding and expansion in Jerusalem during the Second Temple era. It suggests: A long-term commitment: Sheshbazzar was dedicated to building a temple for God, and he didn’t give up easily. Ongoing work: The building process continues even today, meaning that this is not a one-time event but a continuous effort. A sense of anticipation: The phrase "yet it is not finished" implies there's still a lot more work to be done. It suggests there’s a larger purpose or goal behind the construction. In short, the verse describes a persistent and ongoing building project that started with Sheshbazzar and continues to this day. --- Do you want me to: Explain another passage from Ezra 5? Provide more context about the Second Temple period?